MANILA, Philippines — Political analysts are closely watching the unfolding situation surrounding Philippine Senator Bong Go following his recent inclusion as a co-perpetrator in the International Criminal Court (ICC) case against former President Rodrigo Duterte’s war on drugs. In an interview with Bilyonaryo News Channel, University of the Philippines Diliman political science professor Jean Franco suggested a high probability that Go might adopt a low profile strategy similar to that of Senator Bato dela Rosa, who has largely disappeared from public view since the announcement.

Franco noted that the “uncertainty” surrounding the Marcos administration’s potential response to the ICC case has created a climate of apprehension among former Duterte officials. This fear of possible arrest or legal consequences may push some political figures to minimize public exposure, thereby complicating the public discourse on accountability.

Observers highlight that the scenario underscores a larger concern: the intersection of politics, legal responsibility, and public trust. While politicians maintain the right to defend themselves, avoidance could be perceived as an evasion of justice, feeding into narratives of impunity. On the other hand, a visible engagement with the judicial process could strengthen institutional credibility and public confidence in the rule of law.

As the ICC prepares for formal proceedings, the decisions of those implicated, including Go, will send significant signals about the commitment of Philippine leaders to legal and moral accountability. Will Go face the court openly, or will fear drive him to follow a path of concealment? How will this choice impact public perception of justice and governance in the country? (Larawan mula: Bong Go / Facebook)