18 former marines allege ₱805 billion cash delivered to politicians — Whistleblowing or political bombshell?
Robel A. Almoguerra Ipinost noong 2026-02-24 22:34:10
MANILA, Philippines — A group of 18 men claiming to be former members of the Philippine Marines has come forward with sweeping allegations involving massive cash deliveries to prominent political figures, igniting debate across the country. During a press conference led by lawyer Levi Baligod, the group asserted that they personally transported an estimated ₱805 billion in cash to high-ranking personalities, including Ferdinand Marcos Jr. and Martin Romualdez.
According to the statement, the deliveries were allegedly carried out using armored vehicles, helicopters, and airplanes, sometimes consisting of 20 to 50 suitcases per trip. The men claimed the operations were connected to businessman Zaldy Co and were conducted in locations such as Ilocos and Forbes Park in Makati. They also alleged that $2 million was handed to International Criminal Court investigators in 2023 through Antonio Trillanes. A religious figure, Flaviano Villanueva, was also named among those supposedly linked to the deliveries.
As of now, no official responses have been issued by the individuals mentioned, and authorities have yet to release formal findings. The allegations remain unverified.
But beyond the sensational details lies a deeper national concern. In the Philippines, politics has long been intertwined with rumor, loyalty, and public spectacle. Every explosive accusation instantly divides public opinion: believers see courage; skeptics see strategy. The challenge is that in a highly polarized society, facts often arrive late — after narratives have already taken root.
Whether true or false, such claims carry consequences. They can erode trust in institutions, influence elections, and shape historical memory even before evidence emerges. In modern democracies, perception sometimes travels faster than proof.
The real issue may not only be the allegations themselves, but how society processes them: Do we demand evidence, or do we simply choose sides? If accusations alone can already reshape public belief, then what truly determines truth in the court of public opinion — verified facts or the power of a compelling story? (Larawan mula sa: OneTVPhilippines / Facebook)
