Billions in suitcases? Ping Lacson says the ‘math isn’t mathing’
Marijo Farah A. Benitez Ipinost noong 2026-03-04 06:22:53
MARCH 3, 2026 — Here’s the thing about numbers: they don’t lie, but they sure can expose one. Senate President Pro Tempore Panfilo “Ping” Lacson just gave the nation a crash course in basic math and logic, and the lesson is simple — an alleged P805-billion cash delivery scheme doesn’t just sound absurd, it collapses under the weight of arithmetic.
In his privilege speech, Lacson dissected the testimonies of 18 former Marines who claimed they hauled billions in kickbacks from flood control projects. He didn’t dismiss them outright, but he did what any responsible legislator should: he asked if the story even passes the smell test of mathematics. His verdict? Not even close.
Let’s break it down. According to Lacson, moving P805 billion in physical cash would weigh 805 metric tons. Add another 53.6 tons for the suitcases needed to carry them, and you’re looking at a logistical nightmare that rivals moving mountains.
Imagine unloading, counting, and delivering that much money. It would take until 2028 if the operation started in 2023. Now that’s a marathon!
He went further, citing Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas data: the total physical cash in the Philippines in 2024 was around P2.7 trillion. If the allegations were true, nearly 15% of the country’s entire cash supply would have passed through one man’s hands.
“That would mean that P400 billion or half of the P805 billion out of the P2.7 trillion pesos of physical cash of 114 million Filipinos passed through a single individual,” Lacson said.
The kicker? He asked if the supposed mastermind was just a messenger, left with nothing.
This isn’t just about disproving a wild claim. Lacson’s point cuts deeper: the Senate cannot afford to dignify disinformation.
“While every imputation of a crime warrants our attention, none deserves our blind deference,” he warned.
And he’s right. Our institutions lose credibility when they entertain stories that crumble under scrutiny.
But then, allegations of corruption are nothing new in the Philippines. We’ve been hearing tales of kickbacks, padded contracts, and ghost projects for decades. What makes this case stand out is the sheer audacity of the numbers. P805 billion isn’t just a figure but a fantasy that insults our intelligence.
Still, Lacson’s speech isn’t a dismissal of corruption itself. It’s a reminder that while we must remain vigilant against wrongdoing, we also need to guard against propaganda dressed up as scandal.
Trolls thrive on sensational claims, and as Lacson himself said, “Siguradong bibigyang-kulay na naman ng mga trolls ang mga tanong na ito. Pero isipin na lang natin: kung magagamit ang mga nasabing alegasyon bilang instrumento ng propaganda o anumang motibo, hindi ba dapat ay logical at mathematically possible man lamang ang mga akusasyon?”
(Surely trolls will color these questions again. But let’s think: if these allegations are to be used as instruments of propaganda or any motive, shouldn’t they at least be logical and mathematically possible?)
So here we are, caught between the reality of corruption and the unreality of impossible claims. Lacson’s “math test” is a challenge to all of us to demand logic, evidence, and accountability in the stories we choose to believe.
Are we still buying tickets to these wild stories, or ready to trade them in for facts that actually add up?
(Image: Senate of the Philippines | Facebook)
