Diskurso PH
Translate the website into your language:

Is ‘consideration’ becoming an excuse for traffic violations?

Robel A. AlmoguerraIpinost noong 2026-01-08 23:35:13 Is ‘consideration’ becoming an excuse for traffic violations?

MANILA, Philippines — A social media post by Jonjon Fernandez Ultado has sparked renewed debate on traffic enforcement, public roads, and the culture of “consideration” versus accountability. The post, which included photos of traffic violation tickets, expressed frustration over being penalized while allegedly parked only briefly to eat at a carinderia, insisting that no traffic congestion was caused. What followed was a sharp rebuttal emphasizing that public roads are not exempt zones simply because personal circumstances feel justified.

According to traffic authorities responding to the issue, the area in question has already been the subject of multiple complaints and repeated enforcement operations. This suggests that the problem goes beyond a single incident and points to a recurring obstruction concern affecting the majority of motorists who rely on the road for continuous mobility. The argument raised is straightforward but uncomfortable: if parking is prohibited, does the absence of visible traffic excuse the violation? And if one person is allowed to park for convenience, how does that remain fair to everyone else?

The discourse also highlights a deeper, long-standing issue in Philippine road culture—the expectation of special treatment. References to possible overnight parking permits, personal calls to “fix” the situation, and appeals for sympathy were criticized as signs of entitlement rather than civic responsibility. Authorities stressed that if street parking is genuinely needed, the proper solution lies in passing a city council ordinance that legalizes and regulates it equally for all, not through selective tolerance.

Beyond traffic rules, the controversy touches on governance and citizenship. Many Filipinos demand better government services and reforms, yet resist reflection when rules are enforced against them. Public roads exist for collective use, not individual convenience. When personal comfort overrides shared order, the burden is unfairly placed on the majority. This incident leaves the public with a difficult but necessary question to ponder: are we truly seeking fairness and progress on our roads, or simply asking for exceptions when the rules inconvenience us? (Larawan: Gabriel Go / Facebook)