MANILA, Philippines — In a recent statement that has stirred debate among boxing fans, Bill Haney, father and trainer of rising boxing star Devin Haney, appeared to downplay the accomplishments of Filipino icon Manny Pacquiao. According to Bill Haney, Devin’s achievements at just 25 years old—having already become an undisputed world champion—surpass those of Pacquiao, who he implied did not reach such a milestone at the same age.

The remarks have sparked discussion about the nature of greatness in the sport. Pacquiao’s legendary career, marked by unprecedented success across multiple weight classes and decades of sustained competition, is widely celebrated. Comparisons to a younger champion, while perhaps intended to highlight Devin Haney’s early accomplishments, inevitably raise questions about how age, era, and opportunity influence recognition in boxing.

While it is undeniable that Haney’s rise has been impressive, Pacquiao’s journey reflects resilience, adaptability, and a legacy built over years of challenges inside and outside the ring. This brings to light a broader issue in sports discourse: do we value early peak performance over sustained excellence, or can both be celebrated on their own terms? As boxing fans reflect on the evolving landscape of champions, one question lingers: can comparisons across generations ever fairly capture the essence of greatness, or do they risk oversimplifying complex legacies? (Larawan: Google)