LANAO DEL SUR, Philippines — Lanao del Sur Representative Zia Alonto Adiong has firmly stated that any move to impeach President Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. must be grounded on solid constitutional basis, not on rumors, speculation, or political talk. Emphasizing the gravity of the process, Adiong reminded the public that impeachment is not a tool for partisan maneuvering but a solemn mechanism enshrined in the 1987 Constitution.

In his statement, Adiong stressed that impeachment proceedings require clear evidence, due process, and adherence to procedural integrity, regardless of the personality involved. He cautioned against attempts to weaponize impeachment for political gain, warning that such actions could undermine democratic institutions and weaken public trust in the constitutional order. According to the lawmaker, fairness is not optional but mandatory, especially in processes that could destabilize governance.

This pronouncement comes amid recurring political chatter and speculation surrounding the President, reflecting how impeachment discourse often resurfaces during periods of political tension. While impeachment is a legitimate constitutional safeguard meant to hold high officials accountable, Adiong’s remarks draw attention to a recurring dilemma in Philippine politics: the fine line between accountability and political vendetta.

From a broader perspective, his statement invites reflection on how democratic tools are used—or misused—in highly polarized environments. When impeachment threats are raised without clear legal grounding, they risk becoming noise rather than instruments of justice. Worse, they may distract from more pressing national concerns and reduce impeachment to a mere talking point rather than a serious constitutional remedy.

Ultimately, Adiong’s warning serves as a reminder that the strength of a democracy lies not only in its ability to question leaders, but also in its discipline to follow the rule of law. As political debates intensify, the question remains: can impeachment remain a constitutional safeguard rather than a weapon of political convenience? (Larawan: Cong Zia Alonto Adiong / Facebook)