KUALA LUMPUR — January 26, 2026 — A Malaysian religious minister has sparked controversy after claiming that work-related stress could be one of the factors leading individuals to engage in what he described as the “LGBT lifestyle.” Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (Religious Affairs) Dr. Zulkifli Hasan made the remarks in parliament, citing stress, social influences, and a lack of religious practice as contributing factors.

In a written reply, Dr. Hasan stated, “Work-related stress, social influences and a lack of religious practice are among the factors contributing to the involvement of individuals in the LGBT lifestyle.” He further referenced a 2017 study that suggested LGBT-related behavior may emerge from a combination of personal circumstances, sexual experiences, and social pressures rather than a single cause.

The statement quickly drew criticism from activists, academics, and ordinary Malaysians, many of whom took to social media to lampoon the minister’s remarks. Some questioned the logic behind linking workplace stress to sexual orientation, with one viral post sarcastically asking, “Do MPs never experience stress in parliament?” The backlash highlighted growing frustration over government rhetoric that continues to frame LGBTQ identities as deviant or problematic.

The South China Morning Post reported that the minister’s comments came amid heightened scrutiny of Malaysia’s LGBTQ community, following recent enforcement actions against gatherings accused of promoting LGBTQ lifestyles. Religious authorities and police had acted on complaints from a sultan and Islamist politicians, further intensifying pressure on sexual minorities in the country.

Human rights groups condemned the minister’s statement, warning that such remarks perpetuate stigma and misinformation. They argued that sexual orientation is not determined by stress or external pressures but is a natural aspect of human diversity. Critics also pointed out that linking stress to homosexuality trivializes both mental health issues and the lived experiences of LGBTQ individuals.

Despite the backlash, Dr. Hasan defended his position, insisting that his comments were based on research and observations. He maintained that religious guidance and stronger moral values could help prevent individuals from “falling into” what he described as harmful lifestyles.

The controversy has reignited debate over Malaysia’s policies toward LGBTQ citizens, with activists calling for greater protection and recognition of rights. Many argue that instead of targeting sexual minorities, the government should focus on addressing workplace stress, improving mental health support, and fostering inclusivity.

As the debate continues, the minister’s remarks remain a flashpoint in Malaysia’s ongoing struggle between conservative religious views and calls for modern, rights-based governance. The incident underscores the challenges faced by LGBTQ communities in the country, where legal restrictions and social stigma continue to shape public discourse.