MANILA, Philippines — The Supreme Court of the Philippines has officially terminated the government’s decade-long case to shut down Rappler, marking a decisive victory for the online news site and ending one of the most high-profile press freedom battles in the country.

In a resolution dated January 20, 2026, the Supreme Court’s Third Division declared the case closed after granting the Office of the Solicitor General’s request to withdraw its motion for extension. The ruling effectively ends the government’s attempt to enforce a 2018 Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) order that sought to revoke Rappler’s incorporation papers.

The SEC had accused Rappler of violating constitutional restrictions on foreign ownership of media entities, citing investments from the Omidyar Network. Rappler consistently denied the allegations, arguing that the investment was through Philippine Depositary Receipts (PDRs), a financial instrument widely used by other local companies.

“The Court further resolves to…declare this case closed and terminated and the parties informed accordingly,” the Supreme Court resolution stated.

Rappler, founded in 2012, has faced years of legal challenges and political pressure, particularly during the administration of former President Rodrigo Duterte, who frequently criticized the outlet for its coverage of his government’s war on drugs. The case became symbolic of broader concerns about press freedom in the Philippines.

Rappler CEO Maria Ressa, who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2021 for her work defending independent journalism, welcomed the decision as a landmark victory. She emphasized that the ruling not only secures Rappler’s operations but also reinforces constitutional protections for press freedom.

The termination of the case comes at a time when the Philippines continues to grapple with issues of disinformation, online harassment, and media regulation. Analysts say the Supreme Court’s decision may set an important precedent for protecting independent media organizations from politically motivated legal actions.

With the case now closed, Rappler remains free to continue its operations as a legally recognized media company. The ruling underscores the judiciary’s role in upholding constitutional rights and may ease concerns among other independent outlets facing similar pressures.

This development is expected to resonate internationally, as Rappler’s struggle has been closely watched by press freedom advocates worldwide. The closure of the case signals a significant step forward for media independence in the Philippines.