Court stops Escudero, Ngu from leaving — Graft case intensifies
Margret Dianne Fermin Ipinost noong 2026-04-28 07:11:38
The Sandiganbayan has barred Senator Francis “Chiz” Escudero and businessman Maynard Ngu from leaving the Philippines, issuing a precautionary hold departure order (PHDO) as they face graft and plunder investigations linked to alleged irregular flood control projects. The order was released on April 27, 2026, by the Sixth Division of the anti-graft court.
The Sandiganbayan directed the Bureau of Immigration to include Escudero and Ngu in its Hold Departure List, preventing them from traveling abroad while the investigation is ongoing. The PHDO was issued upon the petition of the Office of the Ombudsman, which argued that the two posed a flight risk given the gravity of the charges.
The case stems from accusations by former Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) Undersecretary Roberto Bernardo, who alleged that Escudero received a 20 percent cut amounting to ₱160 million from ₱800 million worth of flood control projects, with Ngu allegedly acting as the conduit for the funds. Bernardo further claimed that Escudero received additional kickbacks of ₱120 million in 2025.
Escudero has strongly denied the allegations, calling them “politically motivated” and part of a “well-orchestrated plan to attack the Senate.” He insisted that the projects in question were legitimate and properly implemented, vowing to contest the charges and clear his name.
Ngu, a businessman known for his ties to various infrastructure ventures, has yet to issue a public statement. His inclusion in the PHDO underscores the court’s view that private individuals implicated in corruption cases can also be restricted from leaving the country.
The Sandiganbayan emphasized that the PHDO is a precautionary measure, not a determination of guilt, but is necessary to ensure the presence of the accused during trial. The DOJ welcomed the ruling, saying it strengthens accountability measures against high-profile figures accused of corruption.
This development highlights the judiciary’s role in curbing corruption and preventing flight risks among accused officials and associates, as the investigation into the alleged flood control anomalies continues.
